Signage at the New York Public Library’s annual Bronx Job Fair & Expo at the Bronx Library Center in … More the Bronx borough of New York, US, on Friday, Sept. 6, 2024. US hiring fell short of forecasts in August after July’s payroll number was revised down, a development likely to fuel ongoing debate over how much the Federal Reserve should cut interest rates. Photographer: Yuki Iwamura/Bloomberg© 2024 Bloomberg Finance LPLast month we looked at 10 college degrees that see high unemployment, and the problem isn’t basketweaving. A number of affected majors are so-called STEM, or science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, degrees that are supposed to hold the key to higher earnings and a place in the top economic quarter. Physics, computer engineering, computer science, chemistry, and information systems and management, all have proven themselves capable of offering a higher than average chance of not having work.
Big tech companies have been laying off thousands, artificial intelligence is going to replace many workers. (It’s already happening.) It will likely get worse, as recent figures have suggested. Those depending on their education may be taken by surprise; June job losses were concentrated in white collar industries.
Non-white collar workers aren’t necessarily at an advantage either. Major industries, including mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction; construction; manufacturing; wholesale trade; retail trade; transportation and warehousing; information; financial activities; professional and business services; leisure and hospitality; and other services, had flat job growth.
However, there’s an even more worrisome turn.
At least a current focus on unemployment has had the happy consolation that unemployment rates are historically low. But are they as low as you might think? Maybe not. There are multiple unemployment numbers that the government publishes. The official one is called U-3. In June it was 4.1%.
There are six different ones, and the definitions of the others help explain what might be missing in U-3.
U-1: People unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a percentage of the civilian labor force.
U-2: Job losers and people who completed temporary jobs, as a percentage of the civilian labor force.
U-3: Total unemployed, as a percentage of the civilian labor force.
U-4: Total unemployed plus discouraged workers, as a percentage of the civilian labor force plus discouraged workers.
U-5: Total unemployed, plus discouraged workers, plus all other people marginally attached to the labor force, as a percentage of the civilian labor force plus all people marginally attached to the labor force.
U-6: Total unemployed, plus all people marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percentage of the civilian labor force plus all people marginally attached to the labor force.
And then there are the descriptions of the additional terms, which may not be obvious.
MORE FOR YOU
People marginally attached to the labor force are those who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the past 12 months.
Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not currently looking for work.
People employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule.
The U-3 measure clearly doesn’t incorporate all the people who might want work but lack all or enough. As the categories run up, so does the unemployment rate. The U-4 in June was 4.5%; the U-5, 5.1%; and the U-6 — the most inclusive — 7.7%.
Also, those numbers are seasonally adjusted, meaning officials modify the numbers in an attempt to remove “predictable seasonal patterns” to see how unemployment changes from month to month, as the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics puts it.
However, it means the official numbers aren’t the actual ones for any given month. The non-seasonally adjusted numbers for June are 4.4% for U-3, 4.7% for U-4, 5.4% for U-5, and 8.1% for U-6.
It’s another way that the government doesn’t admit to how challenging things can be, like how median household incomes have lagged so far behind the cost of living for the last 40 years.
See the entire article on Arizona’s unemployment, or, read more Arizona real estate investing news. The choice is up to you.
